Confined Coverage

 

Coverage contouring
Passive distribution systems in the form of radiating cables also offer precise ‘contouring’ of the RF coverage. “We can better control the coverage using a radiating cable than we can with a point source antenna,” says Raabe. “RF contouring minimizes the risk of co-channel interference between adjacent access points in larger systems, by preventing overlap of coverage zones.”
The WLAN systems of large campuses—such as hotels, universities and airports—require multiple access points to achieve the required coverage and capacity of the network. Depending on channel allocation and re-use, any overlap in coverage between zones or ‘cells’ will result in co-channel interference and increased bit error rates, unless the channels are separated adequately.
Containing the RF signal to prevent interference is difficult using point source antennas, which have ‘hot’ spots at their source with decreasing RF signal strength further away. Radiating cable, on the other hand, can be laid out where coverage is required, dramatically increasing the number of effective RF emission points, and reducing the average distance between the source and wireless client. The power distribution of the WLAN is thereby tailored and kept optimally low to minimize the potential for interference.
Figure 1 illustrates the RF power distribution throughout the engineering quadrant of a major North American university. Utilizing about 330 metres of RFS radiating cable, the passive distribution system was designed around an existing access point, which formerly consisted of a point-source antenna and amplifier. Interference issues with the previous system led the university to adopt the RFS radiating cable solution.
The RF power distribution in Figure 1 extends from around -35 dBm (yellow) at points nearest to the amplifier, to a minimum of around -80 dBm (blue/purple) at the outside walls. Since minimum receiver sensitivity is typically around -100 dBm, RFS designed the university WLAN system for a worst case at the outside walls of -85 dBm. Tailoring the RF coverage to this extent using radiating cable minimizes the potential for co-channel interference, and provides the university with maximum flexibility in channel allocations.
Overall performance—for example, data rate—is also improved using radiating cable, which provides more direct ‘line of sight’ coverage to client devices than point-source antennas. This minimizes the impact of RF obstructions—such as steel filing cabinets and bookcases. Combined with the low emitting power used in radiating cable, the shorter signal path also reduces the effects of multi-path interference, which occurs due to ‘out of phase’ reflections of the RF signal.